06-08-2015 08:22 AM - edited 07-05-2021 03:21 AM
Hi,
Question to the Cisco teams.
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-08-2015 10:48 AM
Hi Michael,
1. I can't tell you this, maybe your VAR or Cisco AM can give you an estimate. However, I can tell you from my own experience that if you want an stable solution which is also fast delivered you can better go with the 2700 or 3700 AP's. Both are positioned higher than the 1850 anyways.
2. All 802.11AC access-points should be backwords compatible with the older standards. But if you want to experience more performance you should get rid of at least the 802.11b clients and also disable those data-rates.
06-12-2015 10:40 PM
Cisco's practice is 4 weeks after announcement and it will be FCS (first customer shipment). If you have access to CCW then this SKU will be made available in the next few days but it will be classified as NPH (new product, HOLD). This means you can order but you won't get a definite shipping out date or availability details.
Besides, why hurry? No one (unless you're one of the beta testers) can use the 1850 in production yet because the code to support the 1850 is not yet available. It will be made available a few days (24- or 48 hours) before the 1850 FCS date.
06-08-2015 10:48 AM
Hi Michael,
1. I can't tell you this, maybe your VAR or Cisco AM can give you an estimate. However, I can tell you from my own experience that if you want an stable solution which is also fast delivered you can better go with the 2700 or 3700 AP's. Both are positioned higher than the 1850 anyways.
2. All 802.11AC access-points should be backwords compatible with the older standards. But if you want to experience more performance you should get rid of at least the 802.11b clients and also disable those data-rates.
06-12-2015 01:49 AM
Thank you.
06-12-2015 01:50 AM
Thank you.
06-12-2015 03:25 AM
No problem. You help others with selecting the reply as "correct Answer", thanks!
06-08-2015 10:59 PM
Here is the datasheet if that helps
HTH
Rasika
06-12-2015 10:40 PM
Cisco's practice is 4 weeks after announcement and it will be FCS (first customer shipment). If you have access to CCW then this SKU will be made available in the next few days but it will be classified as NPH (new product, HOLD). This means you can order but you won't get a definite shipping out date or availability details.
Besides, why hurry? No one (unless you're one of the beta testers) can use the 1850 in production yet because the code to support the 1850 is not yet available. It will be made available a few days (24- or 48 hours) before the 1850 FCS date.
06-13-2015 12:58 AM
Thank you.
06-13-2015 10:41 AM
The info I can provide is that the 1850 is a 1k series AP. So this is a product to really replace the 1702, 1602 access points. This AP is Cisco's 1st Wave 2 AP but only supports 80mhz channel width. There is limitations also right now as it is only supported in the beta v8.1, so that means when it ships (FCS), you will have to have v8.1MR2 on your WLC's. The number of modes are limited to for now on the 1850 to local and monitor mode.
Hope this helps.
-Scott
06-13-2015 10:41 AM
Scott,
Thanks. I will go for the Cisco 3700e AP. Also. One thing with the 3700 is that if I put say, the Wireless Security & Spectrum Intelligence Module, I can't put a WAVE 2 module in future.
06-13-2015 10:44 AM
That is correct. Only one module can be used.
-Scott
06-17-2015 07:56 AM
Hi Scott, where have you heard the WLC will be built in, my understanding was the Mobility Express bundle simply included a CT2504 in the BoM on CCW?
If it did include the WLC it would be competing with Meraki (as well as Aruba IAP) so I would be surprised if Cisco went down that route.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide