08-30-2022 06:34 AM
Does anyone know the best practice for EWC deployment. Currently having EWC 10x C9120AXI-K. Not very sure for the design whether should go for 10x C9120AXI-K all as EWC or make it 2x C9120AXI-K EWC(HA) and convert 8 C9120AXI-K to lightweight AP. Any advise?
08-30-2022 06:54 AM
If you looking HA, you can deploy 2 AP as HA environment and rest will join controller is good option i casee.
08-30-2022 06:57 AM
Is there any issue if all 10 APs running as EWC?
08-30-2022 08:16 AM
why do you want to do that ?
08-30-2022 02:35 PM
The 10 APs came with EWC or is it better to run 2 APs as EWC and the rest convert it as lightweight AP?
08-31-2022 01:24 AM
>... or is it better to run 2 APs as EWC and the rest convert it as lightweight AP
Yes, if you want to use 2 EWC, use HA-mode and or check this document : https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/ewc/17-7/config-guide/ewc_cg_17_7/m_ewc_high_availability.pdf , if not use one EWC only
M.
08-31-2022 08:56 AM
I don't know what the official best practice recommended option is but agree with @balaji.bandi
Having them all running EWC probably just increases the complexity of the solution so keep it simple and make sure your 2 EWC APs are in the best/most secure locations least likely to encounter problems then no concern about APs in more risky locations potentially becoming controllers.
09-21-2022 05:31 PM
Hi thanks, can two ewc use different model?
09-21-2022 05:39 PM
i would suggest having the same model for redundancy.
09-21-2022 05:56 PM
I see ok thanks. Lets say all APs are set, EWC HA and the capwap aps. If one of the EWC down, still require to check the firmware/code to run?
09-22-2022 03:09 AM
if all working as expected, if the EWC primary failes, AP will move to Secondary,
Make sure EWC both AP run same code and same models. ( i would refer the document which was posted my first post for reference how you can build HA using EWC)/
09-22-2022 03:49 AM
Same model is not mandatory but I'd suggest is best practice.
Refer to election process in https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/embedded-wireless-controller-catalyst-access-points/white-paper-c11-743398.html#EWCHAactiveandstandby
09-22-2022 04:07 AM
@Rich R - as per my testing if not same model N+1 deployment, we see odd issues around it took from failover take 3min.
Can you also clarify, how about if we use different codes and not supported features ?
09-22-2022 04:43 AM
Good to know @balaji.bandi - not tried it myself.
Obviously code versions must match and if features aren't supported they just won't work or if they do (by luck) then you can't rely that they'll keep working.
09-23-2022 07:08 AM
Thanks all. Will test the failover and post the result when get the chance. Cheers.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide