10-17-2024 01:29 AM
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-17-2024 01:57 AM
@samhopealpha wrote:
- Desired Signal Coverage
> Min. AP signal strength required: -67dBm- Multiple AP Signal Coverage
> Number of AP's required to provide coverage: 2
> Min. AP signal strength required to provide coverage: -67dBm
#1 says "not enough AP" and #2 says "too much AP".
Logical option is to move the AP from #2 to #1.
@samhopealpha wrote:
- Channel interference
> Interfered APs: Excl. AP's if signal strength is weaker than: -75dBm
> interfering APs: Excl. AP's if signal strength is weaker than: -85dBm
What is this, 2.4 Ghz?
10-17-2024 05:23 AM
Desired Signal Coverage
> Min. AP signal strength required: -67dBm
Multiple AP Signal Coverage
> Number of AP's required to provide coverage: 2
> Min. AP signal strength required to provide coverage: -67dBm
This specifies that for robust network coverage, at least two access points (APs) should be able to provide coverage in the same area. This is critical for ensuring:
Wireless survey results can be adjusted to present either a favorable or unfavorable view. Therefore, as @marce1000 & @Leo Laohoo suggested, it's essential to conduct a professional validation survey. A proper validation survey will be followed by observations and recommendations, which may include adjusting TPC/DCA settings, repositioning access points (APs), or even adding or removing APs to optimize the network performance.
We need to familiarize ourselves with how to read and interpret the survey data, as well as how to implement the recommendations provided in the validation survey report.
Here are some helpful resources to get started:
https://www.ekahau.com/blog/validating-your-wireless-design-with-a-wi-fi-site-survey/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMthdnBh3Vg&ab_channel=EkahauWi-FiDesignTools
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cRNfphOq6k&ab_channel=EkahauWi-FiDesignTools
Jagan Chowdam
/**Pls rate useful responses**/
10-17-2024 01:36 AM - edited 10-17-2024 01:37 AM
- The first two items seem to indicate you need more APs in a certain area; but the most important conclusion
from that is that you should have a real wireless site survey too ,
M.
10-17-2024 01:57 AM
@samhopealpha wrote:
- Desired Signal Coverage
> Min. AP signal strength required: -67dBm- Multiple AP Signal Coverage
> Number of AP's required to provide coverage: 2
> Min. AP signal strength required to provide coverage: -67dBm
#1 says "not enough AP" and #2 says "too much AP".
Logical option is to move the AP from #2 to #1.
@samhopealpha wrote:
- Channel interference
> Interfered APs: Excl. AP's if signal strength is weaker than: -75dBm
> interfering APs: Excl. AP's if signal strength is weaker than: -85dBm
What is this, 2.4 Ghz?
10-17-2024 03:31 AM
The site has 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz.
But the report shows the result of 5Ghz only.
Maybe I need to run the wireless site survey tool in 2.4Ghz as well. and see any different ...
10-17-2024 03:58 AM
Do not run a survey for 2.4 Ghz. It is a waste of time.
If this was for 5.0 Ghz, what is the channel width set to?
10-17-2024 10:27 PM
Thanks for the feedback, May I know why it's waste of time for 2.4Ghz ?
10-17-2024 10:32 PM
@samhopealpha wrote:
May I know why it's waste of time for 2.4Ghz ?
Because with only three useable channels to use, 2.4 Ghz is a fully-congested spectrum. No professional WiFi person will survey/plan for 2.4 Ghz.
10-17-2024 05:23 AM
Desired Signal Coverage
> Min. AP signal strength required: -67dBm
Multiple AP Signal Coverage
> Number of AP's required to provide coverage: 2
> Min. AP signal strength required to provide coverage: -67dBm
This specifies that for robust network coverage, at least two access points (APs) should be able to provide coverage in the same area. This is critical for ensuring:
Wireless survey results can be adjusted to present either a favorable or unfavorable view. Therefore, as @marce1000 & @Leo Laohoo suggested, it's essential to conduct a professional validation survey. A proper validation survey will be followed by observations and recommendations, which may include adjusting TPC/DCA settings, repositioning access points (APs), or even adding or removing APs to optimize the network performance.
We need to familiarize ourselves with how to read and interpret the survey data, as well as how to implement the recommendations provided in the validation survey report.
Here are some helpful resources to get started:
https://www.ekahau.com/blog/validating-your-wireless-design-with-a-wi-fi-site-survey/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMthdnBh3Vg&ab_channel=EkahauWi-FiDesignTools
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cRNfphOq6k&ab_channel=EkahauWi-FiDesignTools
Jagan Chowdam
/**Pls rate useful responses**/
10-17-2024 11:17 PM
Thanks for the feedback, and the video covers a lot of major factors about the survey.
Currently I am using the Airmagnet as the site survey tool
Apart from the Ekahau, are there any other options which is recommended?
10-18-2024 01:24 AM
Try Hamina[.]com.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide