05-05-2017 07:25 AM
Hello everyone,
I am struggling to find information about Rate Limited versions of RSP880 and A9K-MOD200 line cards. Their part numbers are A9K-RSP880-RL-TR and A9K-MOD200RL-TR-B. There is just no information about them in the internen and in open documentation. What I would like to know is if there is anything to consider about this cards apart from the fact that they are rate limited and provide half of the normal bandwidth. These cards are chaper than their non RL counterparts and they are good for Pay As You Grow Approach.
There is also one mistery about A9K-MOD200RL-TR-B. It can't be chosen in CCW during router configuration (we tried 2 routers - ASR9904 and ASR9006), but can only be found as a spare part. Is this card availabe for any systems at all?
Thanks for replies in advance.
Best regards,
Danil
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-05-2017 02:19 PM
Hi Aleksandar,
are you sure that the RL PN has less CPU power, SFP
If yes, then I got it all wrong because I saw on CCW that the rate limit can be lifted with a license.
We have a couple of A9K-RSP880-RL-SE and under show platform and show inventory it's listed as A9K-RSP880-SE.
NAME: "module 0/RSP0/CPU0", DESCR: "ASR9K Route Switch Processor with 880G/slot Fabric and 32GB" PID: A9K-RSP880-SE
On CCW it's possible to acquire this license: A9K-RSP880SE-RL-U - A9K RSP880 Service Edge Upgrade License to 880G/Slot.
It's the same with -TR PN.
It's not a big deal if you can not find the A9K-MOD200RL-TR-B LC when configuring an A9K chassis.
You can order the part as spare. No issues there.
I remember that it was possible to configure it with A9K 9006. I think that it was possible around 6 months ago.
05-05-2017 02:33 PM
hi Smail,
RSP880-RL actually has more disk space, not less. :) The SW imposed rate-limit is on the switching fabric capacity per slot (nothing to do with the CPU). With a license you can unlock the 880Gbps/slot.
/Aleksandar
05-06-2017 01:04 AM
Ok, so the HW is different (different CPU, less SFP
With the license
05-06-2017 08:43 AM
Correct. Once the license is applied, the switch fabric throughput will be exactly the same as in non-RL. The CPU performance will be different, due to less CPU cores.
05-06-2017 09:13 AM
The thing is that our RSP's (we have ordered A9K-RSP880-RL-SE on CCW)
has 1.9 GHz
cisco ASR9K Series (Intel 686 F6M14S4) processor with 33554432K bytes of memory.
Intel 686 F6M14S4 processor at 1907MHz, Revision 2.174
and this SSD:
6220M bytes of hard disk.
25012208k bytes of disk0: (Sector size 512 bytes).
25012208k bytes of disk1: (Sector size 512 bytes).
and there are four SFP+ ports on the front (I have a picture of it).
That is the reason why I got so confused...
05-06-2017 12:18 PM
wow, I stand corrected. It appears our internal documentation is not correct. :( Thanks for correcting me! ;)
05-06-2017 12:18 PM
Yeah, I got worried after I have read your fist reply because I told the customer that it's only a software limit, HW is the same. PN under show platform does not say that it's a different RSP.
What is the command for license activation?
e.g. For additional 20G on
"hw-module port-control license location 0/5/CPU0"
I have these options:
(config)#hw-module ?
all all line cards
location Configure line card location
mac-move Configure
optimized-fabric-
port-control
service Configure service role.
05-06-2017 12:33 PM
The unlocking of the full 880Gbps per slot on A9K-RSP880SE-RL-U, you have to activate the A9K-RSP880SE-RL-U license. There's an equivalent license for -TR.
05-06-2017 12:42 PM
Ok, great.
In the case of A9K-4T16GE-TR, it's necessary to activate the license, then apply the
05-06-2017 12:45 PM
A9K-RSP880SE-RL-U is a chassis license, no additional command should be required.
05-06-2017 12:22 PM
hi Smail,
ok, I did some more attentive reading on this topic. I have mixed up RSP880-Lite with RSP880-RL.
RSP880-Lite is the one with less CPU cores, less SFP+ ports and more SSD space.
RSP880-RL is totally identical to its non-RL counterpart. You can unleash the full switch fabric capacity with a SW license.
Sorry for the confusion and thanks again for correcting me! :)
/Aleksandar
05-07-2017 10:18 PM
Hello Aleksandar and smailmilak,
Thanks for this discussion here. Answered a lot of questions of mine.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide