ā06-07-2013 03:47 AM
Hi,
I tried to configure a secondary ipv4 address on BVI interface from a more specific subnet of the primary's address network.
interface BVI6
ipv4 address 10.112.242.2 255.255.255.0
ipv4 address 10.112.242.21 255.255.255.248 secondary
When I committed the above configuration the following message appeared and I lost the routing for this subnet :
ipv4_arm[290]: %IP-IP_ARM-6-CFLCT_NO_LONGER : The IPv4 address 10.112.242.2/24 on BVI6 is no longer forced down due to IPv4 address conflicts
The same configuration works properly on 7600 platforms.
Thank you,
Michael
Solved! Go to Solution.
ā06-10-2013 01:44 PM
Can't do that... a router only allows one interface per subnet defined, so you can never define an interface with a more specific subnet and the address resolution manager (ARM) detects this and blocks that config.
use show arm conflict to identify the origin of the issue.
xander
ā06-10-2013 05:35 AM
The below is the correct log message, the previous one displayed when I remove the secondary IP from the BVI interface.
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Jun 7 11:35:30.526 : ipv4_arm[290]: %IP-IP_ARM-3-CFLCT_FORCED_DOWN : The IPv4 address 10.112.242.1/24 on BVI6 conflicts with other IPv4 addresses and has been forced down
I also forgot to mention that the platform is A9K with ios-xr 4.2.3. I'm sorry for the
misunderstanding.
Thank you,
Michael
ā06-10-2013 01:44 PM
Can't do that... a router only allows one interface per subnet defined, so you can never define an interface with a more specific subnet and the address resolution manager (ARM) detects this and blocks that config.
use show arm conflict to identify the origin of the issue.
xander
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide