09-12-2012 07:21 AM - edited 03-16-2019 01:09 PM
Hi,
customer has a CUCM, version 8.5
Connected to PTSN via H323 gateway.
If you call a not existing DN via PSTN you just get a ringback instead of an error.
No internal phone rings (at least SOMETHING that works as expected ).
I guess it's something about the gateway, but not sure right now. Any ideas where to start?
Regards,
Sven
09-12-2012 07:27 AM
What is the PSTN connection? PRI, FXO, etc?
Chris
09-12-2012 07:28 AM
Its a PRI connection.
Sven
09-12-2012 07:29 AM
Can you post "debug isdn q931" for one of these calls?
Chris
09-12-2012 07:38 AM
Sure, just did a test. After getting the ringback i just hang up. Looks very normal to me...
14379324: Sep 12 16:34:40.477 MEST: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x3A21
Sending Complete
Bearer Capability i = 0x9090A3
Standard = CCITT
Transfer Capability = 3.1kHz Audio
Transfer Mode = Circuit
Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
Channel ID i = 0xA9838C
Exclusive, Channel 12
Progress Ind i = 0x8083 - Origination address is non-ISDN
Calling Party Number i = 0x2180, '71179763732'
Plan:ISDN, Type:National
Calling Party Number i = 0x2183, '711797630'
Plan:ISDN, Type:National
Called Party Number i = 0xC1, '97074000'
Plan:ISDN, Type:Subscriber(local)
14379325: Sep 12 16:34:40.481 MEST: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: Received SETUP callref = 0xBA21 callID = 0x1E14 switch = primary-net5 interface = User
14379326: Sep 12 16:34:40.497 MEST: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0xBA21
Channel ID i = 0xA9838C
Exclusive, Channel 12
14379327: Sep 12 16:34:40.561 MEST: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> PROGRESS pd = 8 callref = 0xBA21
Progress Ind i = 0x8181 - Call not end-to-end ISDN, may have in-band info
14379328: Sep 12 16:34:40.577 MEST: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0xBA21
Progress Ind i = 0x8188 - In-band info or appropriate now available
14379333: Sep 12 16:34:50.973 MEST: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x3A21
Cause i = 0x8090 - Normal call clearing
14379334: Sep 12 16:34:50.973 MEST: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0xBA21
14379335: Sep 12 16:34:50.989 MEST: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x3A21
09-12-2012 07:41 AM
I even see the call at CAR. Just looks like a normal call, besides "finalCalledPartyNumberPartition" is "null", and the "destIpAddr" is "0.0.0.0"
10-26-2015 01:28 PM
Do u remember how u resolved this issue, am facing the same issue
10-27-2015 12:10 AM
I fixed the issue using the command voice call send-alert :-)
09-12-2012 08:08 AM
Interestingly I do not see expected "unallocated number" message, is there some kinf of wild card pattern in CUCM that matches these calls? Or old DN not assigned to a device?
Chris
09-12-2012 08:13 AM
Don't think there is some wildcard pattern matching, as DNA tells me "Block this pattern / unallocated number".
I can tell for sure that THIS test DN never existed in the whole cluster.
So thats why i have absolutly no idea even where to start searching...
09-12-2012 09:20 AM
Out of curiosity, do you have dial-peers on the gateway beginning with 9...I can see the called number = 0xC1, '97074000' starts with a 9. .Im just thinking out of the box here..
From the trace it look as if the call was routed out back to the PSTN and then disconnected from the PSTN. The disconnect is coming from outside rather than inside.
14379333: Sep 12 16:34:50.973 MEST: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x3A21
Please rate all useful posts
"'Nature is too thin a screen, the glory of the omnipresent God bursts through it everywhere"-Ralph Waldo Emerson
09-12-2012 09:34 AM
From the trace it look as if the call was routed out back to the PSTN and then disconnected from the PSTN. The disconnect is coming from outside rather than inside.
14379333: Sep 12 16:34:50.973 MEST: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x3A21
That can be just because the OP doing the test call, heard the ringback to phantom destination, and hung-up.
If the call was looped back to PSTN, it would show in trace , and would have another effect.
09-12-2012 12:01 PM
Totally correct Paolo. Infact the call couldnt have been re routed because there is no new setup information in the log..
S.angelmahr,
can you please provie the output of "debug voip ccapi inout" This will help us to see if any dial-peer is matched for this call
Please rate all useful posts
"'Nature is too thin a screen, the glory of the omnipresent God bursts through it everywhere"-Ralph Waldo Emerson
09-12-2012 11:23 PM
Thanks for your input. Sorry, i should have given some more information:
- Number is totaly ok. As this is in germany the 9 is just the first number of the phone number. If i call 97074206 (thats our testphone in there) the phone rings.
- I can tell for sure a dial-peer matches. The number gets translated to the e164 pattern 4971197074000 and is sent to the CUCM. As mentioned i even can see the call in the CAR file on the CUCM.
We don't have fixed number length in germany. Some phone numbers are longer, some are shorter, but of course none are overlapping. So we've always have to keep our route pattern flexible.
Big question is why the CUCM answers with a ringback, instead of the unallocated number message. Ad told: DNA clearly tells me that this should get an unallocated number message.
Any other ideas?
09-12-2012 11:30 PM
I know that one can take CM traces, may be these would reveal something.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide