cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Announcements
212
Views
0
Helpful
0
Replies
Highlighted
Beginner

Route-map sequence match issue

Hi All,

Configuration is same, but I have sequence match issue.

#sh ip ro 10.1.1.0
Routing entry for 10.1.1.0/24
  Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0
  Tag 2
  Redistributing via bgp 1
  Advertised by bgp 1 route-map static-to-bgp
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  * 1.1.1.1, via GigabitEthernet2/31
      Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
      Route tag 1
    1.1.1.5, via GigabitEthernet2/30
      Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
      Route tag 2

#sh ip ro 20.1.1.0
Routing entry for 20.1.1.0/24
  Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0
  Tag 1
  Redistributing via bgp 1
  Advertised by bgp 1 route-map static-to-bgp
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  * 1.1.1.5, via GigabitEthernet2/30
      Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
      Route tag 1
    1.1.1.1, via GigabitEthernet2/31
      Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
      Route tag 2

ip route 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 GigabitEthernet2/31 1.1.1.1 tag 1
ip route 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 GigabitEthernet2/30 1.1.1.5 tag 2
ip route 20.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 GigabitEthernet2/30 1.1.1.5 tag 1
ip route 20.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 GigabitEthernet2/31 1.1.1.1 tag 2

route-map static-to-bgp, permit, sequence 10
  Match clauses:
    tag 2
  Set clauses:
    metric 20
  Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
route-map static-to-bgp, permit, sequence 20
  Match clauses:
    tag 1
  Set clauses:
    metric 10
  Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes

Both 10.1.1.0/24 and 20.1.1.0/24 shuld be tag 2 because sequence 10 is fast thsn 20 ??

Everyone's tags (4)
CreatePlease to create content
Content for Community-Ad
July's Community Spotlight Awards