Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About j-lehmann
08-07-2019
Stats
Member since
02-02-2003
154
Posts
5
Helpful
5
Solutions
Created by
j-lehmann
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
06-20-2019
01:20 PM
06-20-2019
01:20 PM
I check the drivers and 6.0 use the same driver as 6.5. Best regards Jörg
... View more
Created by
j-lehmann
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
06-20-2019
12:05 PM
06-20-2019
12:05 PM
I install Cisco Custom Image 6.0U3 and here it works. For now we will stay on this version. No time to troubleshoot 6.5U2. Best regards Jörg
... View more
Created by
j-lehmann
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
06-20-2019
09:25 AM
06-20-2019
09:25 AM
I run again the HUU and if I tick only the X550T2 a was able to upgrade the FW again. But no luck, I can not see the VMNIC0 and VMNIC1 under VMWAre. As you can see here , the LOMs are enable under BIOS, I think I have to open a case.
... View more
Created by
j-lehmann
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
06-20-2019
07:41 AM
06-20-2019
07:41 AM
Hello, I rerun the HUU, but they skip the upgrade, it is the same FW. I can confirm that under the BIOS the LOM Ports 1 ans 2 are enable. I go now to disable the NICs boot the server, enable again and restart the server. Best regards Jörg
... View more
Created by
j-lehmann
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
06-20-2019
07:09 AM
06-20-2019
07:09 AM
Hello, I'm actually from the Collaboration site. Now I have to install two new C220M5SX without VMWare. First I installed the latest BIOS version 4.0.4c via Host Upgrade utility. Here all the NIC drivers were updated. After that I took the current custom VMWare from Cisco Mware_ESXi_6.5.0_10719125_Custom_Cisco_6.5.2.3.iso. Unfortunately VMWare does not recognize the X550T2 on 2 machines. According to the UCS Hardware and Software Compatibility page all drivers are correct. The BIOS recognizes the X550T2, also shows me that a Cabel is connected here. But under VMWare I cannot use the ports. With the command esxcfg-nics -l there are no VMNIC0 and 1. I think the second command is more hardware related, and here we see the vmnic0 and 1. VMWare have the correct drivers. Any suggestion how to fix the problem? Best regards Jörg
... View more
Labels:
10-11-2016
08:35 AM
Hello Community,
My SIP Provider send called number without an "+", so I will manipulat the incoming SIP Invite to add the "+". I manipulate the "To" field like this to add the +
voice class sip-profiles 100 request INVITE sip-header To modify "<sip:(48.*)@(.*)>" "<sip: + \1@\2>"
I see an incoming invite from the SIP Provider
INVITE sip:481234567@172.18.15.100 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.10:5060;branch=z9hG4bK65a17674;rport Max-Forwards: 70 From: "49999999" <sip:493999999@10.10.10.10>;tag=as577ad6e6 To: <sip: 48123456 @172.18.15.100> Contact: <sip:49999999@10.10.10.10:5060> Call-ID: 20737d282d40c419660508407db54330@10.10.10.10:5060 CSeq: 102 INVITE User-Agent: FTP_B2B_SP Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:36:30 GMT ...
and an manipulatet Trying to the Provider with a "+" in the To field, so my incoming SIP Profile works.
SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.10:5060;branch=z9hG4bK65a17674;rport From: "49999999" <sip:49999999@10.10.10.10>;tag=as577ad6e6 To: <sip: +48123456 @172.18.15.100> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:36:30 GMT Call-ID: 20737d282d40c419660508407db54330@10.10.10.10:5060 CSeq: 102 INVITE Allow-Events: telephone-event Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-15.5.3.M4 Content-Length: 0
I think now that the manipulatet "To" field with the "+" is also use for my outgoing dial-peer to the CUCM, but I am wrong.
INVITE sip:48123456@172.16.0.173:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.18.13.130:5060;branch=z9hG4bK30BDB From: "49999999" <sip:49999999@172.18.13.130>;tag=1E98EC20-1B7E To: <sip: 48123456 @172.16.0.173> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:36:30 GMT Call-ID: 2BAD9F51-8EE611E6-83CCB578-413D1C60@172.18.13.130 ...
So, the question is, where is my mistake.
Please find the config here.
voice service voip address-hiding mode border-element license capacity 5 allow-connections sip to sip fax protocol none sip early-offer forced sip-profiles inbound ! ! voice class uri 100 sip host ipv4:10.10.10.10 ! ! voice class sip-profiles 100 request INVITE sip-header To modify "<sip:(48.*)@(.*)>" "<sip:+\1@\2>" dial-peer voice 100 voip description *** Inbound WAN side dial-peer *** session protocol sipv2 incoming uri via 100 voice-class codec 1 voice-class sip early-offer forced voice-class sip profiles 100 inbound ! dial-peer voice 250 voip description *** Outbound LAN side dial-peer *** destination-pattern [+1-9] session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:172.16.0.173 voice-class codec 1 voice-class sip bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0 voice-class sip bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0
Thanks for help
-Jörg
... View more
Labels:
09-30-2016
06:07 AM
Thank you, but the example sign the Router Cert also via a CA and the CUCM Cert is not a Multisan Cert.
The question is, is a multisan Cert supported on the GW side and can we still use a self sign Cert for the GW?
Best regards
Jörg
... View more
09-30-2016
05:55 AM
Hi, we have a CUCM Cluster and use a private CA to create a Multi SAN Cert for the Cluster. We want to implement a SIP TLS Trunk to a gateway. The gateway have a self sing certificate. Now we want to import the Mutlisan Cert and root cert to the GW and the GW Self sign cert to the CUCM Cluster. Is that zenario supported and will it work?
Thanks for support
-Jörg
... View more
Labels:
09-29-2016
12:46 AM
Hi Deepak,
thank you for the info, I forward the info to my customer. If we have a HA System, I think we have run the tool twice, for each IPCCX, is that correct?
Best regards
Jörg
... View more
09-23-2016
07:44 AM
Hello Deepak,
the cust do only step 2 very often because the system have the default language german but the same client have different language.
As you can see in the attach log.
At 2016-09-16 10:42:59:250 the system have the correct client version <10.6.1.2011>
Few hours later
at 15:26:13:343 have the system the old one <10.6.1.95>
I hope you have an other Idea?
regards
jeorg
... View more
09-23-2016
01:52 AM
Since we upgrade a IPCCX system from 10.6 to 10.6 (1) SU2 and upgrade all agents it is a fairly common occurrence that the agent software says there is a newer version available and must be updated. The cust update the Systems again but after few days the agent have again update the software to a newer version.Have one the same problem and perhaps have a solution?
Ever grateful for your support
-Jörg
... View more
Labels:
Created by
j-lehmann
in Collaboration, Voice and Video Documents
in Collaboration, Voice and Video Documents
06-29-2016
09:18 AM
06-29-2016
09:18 AM
Very good doc. I have one question, a Cisco TAC SE told us we have also to use the CTL Client to regenerate the CTL File after we regenerate the callmanager cert and TVS cert. Is that correct? We regenerate not the CAPF Cert.
We run CUCM 9.1
Thanks in Advance!!
Jörg
... View more
Created by
j-lehmann
in IP Telephony and Phones
in IP Telephony and Phones
01-05-2016
06:08 AM
01-05-2016
06:08 AM
Hi Forum,
if I connect my Samrtphone via Bluetooth and import the Directory, I can´t dial the Directory numbers If i use the Primary Line only if I use the Smartphone Line. Is the a way to use the Primary Line to dial Smartphone Directory on a 8851 Phone?
Thanks
joerg
... View more
Labels:
04-17-2015
04:26 AM
Hi, today we have the same problem. Have you solved the problem? -Jörg
... View more
05-17-2014
09:30 AM
we run not in thist bug. with the old cucm the phone have a phone load 8.5.x. the skinny version was different as in firmware 9.3.x and the firewall inspection block the registration. regards joerg
... View more
Created by
j-lehmann
in Unified Computing System Discussions
06-20-2019
06-20-2019
I check the drivers and 6.0 use the same driver as 6.5.Best regardsJörg
Created by
j-lehmann
in Unified Computing System Discussions
06-20-2019
06-20-2019
I install Cisco Custom Image 6.0U3 and here it works.For now we will
stay on this version. No time t...
Created by
j-lehmann
in Unified Computing System Discussions
06-20-2019
06-20-2019
I run again the HUU and if I tick only the X550T2 a was able to upgrade
the FW again. But no luck, I...
Created by
j-lehmann
in Unified Computing System Discussions
06-20-2019
06-20-2019
Hello, I rerun the HUU, but they skip the upgrade, it is the same FW.I
can confirm that under the BI...
Created by
j-lehmann
in Unified Computing System Discussions
06-20-2019
06-20-2019
Hello,I'm actually from the Collaboration site. Now I have to install
two new C220M5SX without VMWar...
Created by
j-lehmann
in Collaboration Applications
06-21-2018
06-21-2018
Hello, it is possible to edit the Email Template that a user can dial
direct from the Email invite t...
Created by
j-lehmann
in Collaboration Applications
10-13-2017
10-13-2017
Hello, we have a CUCM system with ten MX300G2, CMS as conf Bridge
connected to CUCM and TMS. If we u...
10-13-2017
Hello, set the System in Maintenance mode and set it back, then the
system will restart. best regard...
Created by
j-lehmann
in Unified Communications Infrastructure
04-27-2017
04-27-2017
Hi,I discuss this today with a Cisco SE, it is enough to have a CUCM
Essential LIC to receive the SW...
04-27-2017
Hello,we plan to use a CWMS System. The cust have no CUCM, but we need a
CUCM to connect the CWMS vi...
10-11-2016
Hello Community, My SIP Provider send called number without an "+", so I
will manipulat the incoming...
09-30-2016
Thank you, but the example sign the Router Cert also via a CA and the
CUCM Cert is not a Multisan Ce...
09-30-2016
Hi, we have a CUCM Cluster and use a private CA to create a Multi SAN
Cert for the Cluster. We want ...
09-29-2016
Hi Deepak, thank you for the info, I forward the info to my customer. If
we have a HA System, I thin...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 02-02-2003 03:30 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 08-07-2019 12:17 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 154 |
| Total Helpful Votes Received | 5 |
