08-16-2022 04:23 AM
We have installed 4 x 1542i Cisco AP's, set to use Mobility Express (v 8-10-130-0 ) in mode Bridge. They are two separate links operating independently to different buildings in the area.
My issue is if both links are switched on the first link is dropped and you cannot connect to the UI of the controller, the last link up works and you can connect. If you switch the working link off the non-working link immediately connects and you can login to it. Clearly the 'preferred controllers' are broadcasting and talking to each other and knocking each other out. I have logged this with my distributor and Cisco and getting no help.
I have tried using different IP ranges on the controllers, also tried bridge groups to separate the devices logically but they are running on the same Ethernet. I did expect a response along the lines of, 'its a known issue on 8-10-130-0 use e.g. 8-10-151-0' but nothing.
Can anyone offer some guidance here as I beginning to think this kit is not up to the job. Much appreciated.
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-06-2022 01:27 AM
Hi, thanks for the info on the Firmware. I suspected layer 2 and the 2 x ME boxes talking to each other, after 2 months I have been advised not to run 2 x Controllers. I am looking to convert one back to CAPWAP and set as the RAP on the 2nd bridge and manage through 1 controller. If thats not possible change both controllers to CAPWAP and install a 9115 as a full blown controller to manage 2 x MESH (PtP) links. If anyone has done that before it would be useful to know.
08-16-2022 05:45 AM
Looks for me the network Loop as you described in the post
Do you have any network diagram, how they are terminiated on both the side switch ports ? what switch model is that ?
what is the config on the switch port, check any STP blocking of that port ?
08-16-2022 06:07 AM
The switches installed are HP JH328a and are unmanaged with PoE+ so no STP on these. There were no other active links to the remote buildings at either end. The links are on either end of the building, across the road at either end to a different building, there were old point to point links in place, these were switched off for the install.
08-16-2022 06:32 AM
08-16-2022 06:39 AM
yes i have used this many times over the years setting up the same 1542i models without issue, its with two links i have the issue, i am going to look over other switches on site regarding STP. I suspect its Cisco firmware but open to all options at the minute.
08-16-2022 09:08 AM
Can you draw small diagram, i still suspect due to bridge, the switch seeing loop i guess.
08-17-2022 01:01 AM
08-17-2022 02:43 AM
as per the diagram it should work as expected.
i would advise to check the HP switch logs
08-16-2022 05:51 AM
Did you check the spanning tree behavior on the switch when this issue happened?
08-16-2022 08:20 AM
No, i have asked site if they have STP on their other switches.
08-18-2022 12:52 AM
STP is on the backbone switches, site are going to switch the other link on and record the STP logs.
09-06-2022 07:36 AM
Site have enabled both links, only one works, nothing trapped with STP on the switches so this is not a loop. I have always suspected Cisco firmware to be the issue but this is not being honoured under warranty even though we have put our case through distribution and Cisco before the 60 day software terms. We are just pushed to buy extended contracts or we get no help.
Any other ideas? I have looked through the latest firmware and there is nothing in there that appears to resolve an issue with more than one link in place.
10-05-2022 04:15 PM
I doubt that new software will help but 8.10.130.0 is seriously out of date and there have been a lot of fixes, not all of which are documented in the release notes. So for a start please update them to 8.10.181.0 to eliminate the possibility that it's something which has been fixed, and also addresses a number of security PSIRTs:
https://software.cisco.com/download/home/286312622/type/286289839/release/8.10.181.0
But if that doesn't help I think the problem is that you're effectively trying to use ME in an unsupported way. Changing IPs won't help - it's the layer 2 broadcast domain that allows them to see each other so you need to make sure they're on different vlans then they should both work independently. You can route between those vlans.
10-06-2022 01:27 AM
Hi, thanks for the info on the Firmware. I suspected layer 2 and the 2 x ME boxes talking to each other, after 2 months I have been advised not to run 2 x Controllers. I am looking to convert one back to CAPWAP and set as the RAP on the 2nd bridge and manage through 1 controller. If thats not possible change both controllers to CAPWAP and install a 9115 as a full blown controller to manage 2 x MESH (PtP) links. If anyone has done that before it would be useful to know.
11-04-2022 07:27 AM
Just to confirm for anyone following this. I did wipe the second ME unit and set back to CAPWAP, whitelisted it on the remaining ME controller and everything worked so will close this case.
I still believe there is an issue on the ME code, why offer "Primary controller", "Primary controller and preferred master" and "Preferred master" options if they will no coexist...
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide