Cisco Bug Discussions

This problem also exist on  12.2(55)SE8. Downgraded to SE6, and the problem is gone

Hi Team,I Have pair of 5510 And primary Firewall cpu usage is 88% even if i have disabled SNMP server it is still the same. When i issue show run then also it gets failed. I cannot do anything on Firewall. Is this Bug because of that ?Current Version...

Hi all,anyone knows the ETA for the SMU for this issue?Thanks,Regards,Nuno Marques.

Anybody know if there is a fix coming for this in 9.1.x?  Currently it just shows 10.0.x

Dear All, what is the problem.....ths                 

I'm see the exact same symptoms on our ASR1002's.  we effectively have heirarchical QoS configured, or CB shaping.  I don't see any of the shape rate CIR's being exceeded, yet I see extensive random/tail drops occuring when the physical interface tra...

Hello,are you aware about the fact that this Bug is already existing in CPI 2.0.294 new installed (no MIgration Background from any other Versions) ?At this time not Patch does resolve it.The issue is joined and happens when the lobby admin want's to...

Hello,what that bug means for us - the vWLC comes with new s/n almost each time when vMotion is involved. That throws away permanent AP license (which is linked to s/n).the workaround we have is to lock vWLC VM to a specific host, which actually kill...

Hi all ,Regarding bug  CSCuh38133 , is it device vulnerabile if ip device tracking is not used on device ?Any documents for that ?#show  ip device tracking allIP  Device Tracking = Disabled-------------------------------------------------------------...

HelloIs it possible this bug is also present in 7962G model with  SCCP42.9-3-1SR2-1S?I have same kind of behavior with that phone type.

HiI do see this similar Issue for my H323 Registrations only, SIP is working fine.I do a Restart of Content Engine to Restore Services.Does the Bug Apply for H323 also.????

I think I have this bug on a non generation X firewall, a 5520 running 8.4(3)9.  I've been trrying to find a workaround without wasting a TAC case.  Could you test this model and version?  And then widen the parameters of the bug?

Hello,Do have news about this case ? We encoured the same problem.Our version : 6.0(2)N2(1)Thank you for your support.Best regards,Gauthier.

Hi All,Can someone explain more about this bug. what are the print messages? can this leads to code conversion from 8.2 to 8.4 go on loop. If yes how?