06-11-2012 02:23 AM - edited 03-16-2019 11:36 AM
Hi,
I have a customer running a cluster of five CUCM 8.6(2)SU1 servers on MCS7835-I3 hardware - see full details below:
admin:show version active
Active Master Version: 8.6.2.21900-5
Active Version Installed Software Options:
cmterm-7945_7965-sccp.9-2-1.cop
cmterm-7942_7962-sccp.9-2-1.cop
ciscocm.refresh_upgrade_v1.1.cop
cm-locale-en_GB-8.6.2.1000-1.cop
admin:show hardware
HW Platform : 7835I3
Processors : 1
Type : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5504 @ 2.00GHz
CPU Speed : 2000
Memory : 4096 MBytes
Object ID : 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.585
OS Version : UCOS 5.0.0.0-2
My problem is that the web admin service fails every week or so requiring the Tomcat service to be restarted. At the time of writing 8.6(2)SU1 is the lates version available. Has anyone else seen this and what steps did you take to resolve it?
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-11-2012 02:50 AM
Hi James,
Looks like it could be this bug;
CSCty36110 - CUCM 8.6 Tomcat OOM with "com.rsa.sslj.x.cu" suspect under high AXL Load
Description
Details
8.6(2.10000.30),9.0(0.99111.3)
More
Status:
Fixed
Last Modified:
Jun 08,2012
9.0(0.99091.6),9.0(0.99091.2),9.0(0.98000.93)
9.0(0.98000.186),8.6(3.98000.206),8.6(2.22028.1)
1.9(9.98000.16)
Less
Product:
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CallManager)
Platform:
Dependent
Severity:
2 - severe
Cheers!
Rob
"Show a little faith, there's magic in the night" - Springsteen
06-11-2012 02:32 AM
Hi James
I've not seen the issue on that specific version but this is like the common cold for CallManagers. It seems to crop up every few releases and the resolution so far has always been an upgrade.
If there is no 'fixed' version then you'll probably want to raise a tac case as there's usually little you can do due to the appliance model.
Aaron
06-11-2012 02:50 AM
Hi James,
Looks like it could be this bug;
CSCty36110 - CUCM 8.6 Tomcat OOM with "com.rsa.sslj.x.cu" suspect under high AXL Load
Description
Details
8.6(2.10000.30),9.0(0.99111.3)
More
Status:
Fixed
Last Modified:
Jun 08,2012
9.0(0.99091.6),9.0(0.99091.2),9.0(0.98000.93)
9.0(0.98000.186),8.6(3.98000.206),8.6(2.22028.1)
1.9(9.98000.16)
Less
Product:
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CallManager)
Platform:
Dependent
Severity:
2 - severe
Cheers!
Rob
"Show a little faith, there's magic in the night" - Springsteen
06-11-2012 11:52 AM
Thanks Guys,
I think that it is the bug that Rob has detailed. This cluster has five servers so I am a bit reluctant to install the
8.6(2.22028.1) Engineering Special just to fix this.
Until a mainstream 8.6 fix is released I think I will set up a script to restart the Tomcat service daily - I know that I can do this by running Plink (party of the Putty suite) as a scheduled task under Windows unless anyone can suggest a more elegant solution?
06-11-2012 12:59 PM
Hi James,
That sounds like a pretty good work-around to me my friend I know that
clients don't want to upgrade to every ES that comes down the path, so if that's the
only issue you are encountering then waiting for a full release seems reasonable to me.
Cheers!
Rob
"Show a little faith, there's magic in the night" - Springsteen
06-22-2012 10:23 PM
Has anyone else had trouble installing the 8.6.2.22028-1 ES? I just tried it tonight for a client and the checksum part of the install fails and it aborts, however the MD5 on the file matches what the special download is on cisco page which the TAC engineer said was correct. MD5 for the ISO was
a3d8ae63624df3bc642c86fbc3ca0253.
I tried upgrade with DVD and via FTP and both failed.
Waiting on TAC now, maybe I just got a bad file since it sounds like others did this update fine.
I wish they would post a SU1a or SU2 now with the fix as regular download since this can be a pain for some installs.
10-15-2012 04:44 AM
Hi,
According to http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282074295/93949/cucm-readme-862asu2.pdf this bug should be resolved in 8.6(2a) SU2. Is that right? Does anyone have experience with this bugfix?
Regards,
Ruud van Strijp
10-15-2012 06:41 AM
Hi Ruud,
Yes, that is the "fixed-in" 8.6(2) version that is available for download
8.6(2a)su2 US Export Restricted - full encryption capabilities (non-bootable) - For upgrade from 8.x+. Upgrades from 6.1(4)+, 7.1(3), 7.1(5) need to be requested via PUT (www.cisco.com/upgrade) or purchased to obtain necessary license
UCSInstall_UCOS_8.6.2.22900-9.sgn.iso
CSCty36110 - CUCM 8.6 Tomcat OOM with "com.rsa.sslj.x.cu" suspect under high AXL Load
9.0(1.10000.2),9.0(1.10000.15),9.0(0.99091.6)
9.0(0.99091.2),9.0(0.98000.93),9.0(0.98000.52)
9.0(0.98000.47),9.0(0.98000.25),9.0(0.98000.186)
8.6(4.10000.15),8.6(3.98000.206),8.6(2.22900.9)
8.6(2.22028.1),1.9(9.98000.16)
Cheers!
Rob
"May your heart always be joyful
May your song always be sung" - Bob Dylan
11-10-2012 01:13 AM
Hello Everyone,
I hope You are doing well, may be this will help, I'm trying to hit the bug on the currently installed 8.6.1.20000-1 before proceeding with the upgrade to the 8.6.2.22900-9 as a Proof of concept for our customer, we have tens of servers to Upgrade in 4 clusters, so it's a long way to go, I'm trying to ask Cisco TAC to help me to regenerate the issue on the LAB we created specially for it, if You would like, I can tell You the results of the LAB results. (it would be nice if You have any ideas or scenarios to try to regenerate the issue, I'm trying to perform excessive AXL communications with 2000 users between a CUCM and a Cisco Unity Connection)
We have another customer who faced the same issue and it was resolved with the 8.6.2.22900-9.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Muhammad
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide