Network Management

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

“Webinar

 
Labels

Forum Posts

Resolved! RME Netconfig Jobs

I'm looking to deply "no mop enabled" and "no lat enabled" via Netconfig to some of our device interfaces.Is the option "port based" the right option to choose since this an interface level command?I chose 100 mbps Ethernet, 1 Gbps Ethernet port, and...

dionjiles by Level 1
  • 1167 Views
  • 10 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

It's taking forever for DFM to disovery devices in LMS 3.2 I have started a discovery at 9:00 am EST this morning for 487 devices and so far only 90 have been found and set to known while the other are still in a learning state.I have been dealing wi...

dionjiles by Level 1
  • 607 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

I am using LMS3.2 and I donot know how to customize a report or sys log to be sent to me as a notification or e-mail when aport or the switch is down, and how to search for a specified host using the ip or the mac address.

We are building a new CWSI server.  The new server is LMS 3.2 and old is 2.6.Besides doing a wrapper.pl backup/restore to the new, does anyone know if there is a way to do a export of the RME Reports - Custom Report Templates and move to the new LMS ...

rmetro by Level 1
  • 518 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hello,I just installed a new LMS 3.2 on a new station under Windows2003 in replacement of a LMS 2.6 under Windows2000.I got an issue on the devices discovery process.Normally, I should have 225 devices (found by LMS 2.6) and I got only about half of ...

ppoiron by Level 1
  • 917 Views
  • 7 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hello,I've manually added a device on cisco works through CS (Device and Credentials -->Device Management)On RME is says it failed to collect inventory and config archive. The message is: could not access "pix" via snmp...I want to edit the device cr...

muca by Level 3
  • 675 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Resolved! LMS 3.0.1

Hey clarke,i have running LMS 3.0.1 with Dec 2007 update,it running fine with discovewred devices (6500 series)In discovery summary i see reacheable devices 17 and unreacheable devices XX,The unreacheable devices are not the seperate devices but they...

lambay2000 by Level 2
  • 1500 Views
  • 14 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card