Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,
We've got CMS 2.1.3 (Single box deployment) with CUCM 11.5.1SU2 and expressway 8.9.
I am trying to allow outbound calls to be routed from our CMS to CUCM for further processing.
There is a secure sip trunk between the 2 and I am able to call fro...
Hi,
We have some UCSB-F-FIO-785M cards from B200 M3 servers and are wondering if they would also work in B200 M4 servers?
I can only see the newer type cards in the B200 M4 pdf but was wondering if anyone tried it (http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/pr...
Hi, We're trying to migrate all our DN's from E.164 to +E.164 on our CUCM 9.1.2SU1.It seems that for the meetme patterns I cannot do this as it's saying I cannot use the +Any help? Thanks, Jeroen
Hi,We're planning to upgrade our CUCM from 8.5 to 8.6.2 and I am finding some contradicting information with regards to upgrading the jtapi client on the PG's so that they match the CUCM version. So just wanted to check with you guys what would be th...
Hi,We currently have 2 x 2960s switches that are live and have an erherchannel between them. To free up the ports used by the etherchannel, to increase the bandwidth between the 2 and to make it easier to manage them, we have decided to stack them to...
Hi Patrick,
Yes indeed, interface b is configured for call bridge use and interface c is configured for turn use.
I have now added the fqdn of the turn server to the secure sip trunk on CUCM like Oleksandr has suggested. This seems to work. the CUCM...
Hi Kirk,
Thanks for your reply. I think you have misunderstood my question.
I am asking if the UCSB-F-FIO-785M is compatible with the B200 M4?
Thanks,
Jeroen
Hi Guys, OK, thanks for your help. Indeed it seems + or \+ is not supported.I have done it with a translation pattern now so that is OK. Thanks, Jeroen
