Wireless

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

review


Labels

Forum Posts

Cisco AP CW9166I-BWLC - Catalyst 9800-40 Wireless Controller - 17.9.4a Have these setup in our corp HQ. Users moving from AP to AP drop and have to re-establish while others move area to area with no issues. Various laptop makes and models and doesn'...

drkershner by Frequent Visitor
  • 1331 Views
  • 6 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi All,  Three AP2802 LED is cycling on Red-Off-Green-Off-Blue-Off. All APs can be seen already on 5520 WLC. According to the starting guide "Access point location command invoked". Two out of three are already added in AP group but all of them have ...

joagusti.v1 by Frequent Visitor
  • 10797 Views
  • 10 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi,Im configuring AP C9105 switched AP on 9800 WLC. its flex local switching with AP ports to act as a switch in different VLANs. should I use the existing  Policy TAG with WLCAN-POLICY MAPs and add RLAN-Policy Maps or create a new policy TAG dedicat...

Hi guys,I currently have seven /22 IP networks for my wireless clients, which are bonded in one Interface Group. Have anyone analyzed if there is some performance penalty for larger segments like broadcast/multicast traffic? What is the recommendatio...

klnnnnng by Level 3
  • 1928 Views
  • 10 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

We’re currently experiencing issues with our Guest SSID WiFi. Several users in the office are unable to connect, even when they are near an access point. The connection process gets stuck and keeps repeating.We’ve already rebooted the affected AP, bu...

Jerick by Community Member
  • 1253 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Good Morning, Just wondering if anyone has managed to setup radsec between Meraki APs and Cisco ISE. I'm certain I've setup both environments correctly, but authentication (pass or fail) isn't showing with the ISE logs, so suspect it's an issue with ...

image.png image.png
sysint-12 by Level 3
  • 10420 Views
  • 11 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

We are running ISE 3.1 and I have plans to upgrade the C9800 to 17.9.x (which is the recommended one). But I see in the release notes that ISE 3.1 is not listed in the compatibility matrix.Is it true that ISE 3.1 is not supported?!https://www.cisco.c...

it-lisens by Frequent Visitor
  • 1955 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi, I was doing research and know that 17.9.3 was the latest IOS that reintroduced compatibility for Wave 1 APs. What doesn't seem clear is whether that is the only one. Does reintroduced mean all of 17.9.x will be compatible? Or is 17.9.3 the latest...

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card