Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
On 16.12.3a with cat 3850's and seeing a similar error, but with a code 2 instead of code 1. Wondering if others are seeing this? The only policer is that which is setup when issuing auto qos voip cisco-phone. The ports in question do not have cisco...
Two questsions.1) We've been using the "cloud" version of IronPort for the last eight months. I see that we're running version 7.x, so at what point does Cisco/Ironport typically upgrade cloud customers to new releases?2) Version 7.x has a terrible p...
Setting up new UCS with 2.0(1s). The bundle shipped with the hard disks in each b200-m2. Prior to installing ESX5, the hard disks were removed (blade powered down) and blanking panels inserted. The service profile has a "no local storage policy" and ...
I'm going to add memory to an existing B200 M2 blade that's associated with service profile and is in use. Do I need to do anything more than to shut down the blade/OS, pull it, add RAM, re-install, power up?Given that the blade is going back to the ...
Part of Intel's revision from the 5500 to 5600 series processor was support for maintaining memory speed at 1333 MHz (for the processors that support it) with two DIMMs per channel. Will a B200 M2 with x56xx processors run memory at 1333 MHz with two...
@maflesch If Cisco is open to feedback, backup of Cat Center is a sore spot in an otherwise decent evolution of prime. It's overly complicated compared to Prime (or other Cisco platforms), and the support so narrow e.g., Can't for example backup to ...
@maflesch As a customer, there is nothing more annoying than updating every four months, only to find out that while a couple of the bugs you were hitting are fixed, there a bunch of other new bugs that you have to live with for another 3-4 months un...
@maflesch Meaning that when I run across a bug that I may be hitting, it's often the case that 2.3.7.9 is the identified "first fixed." Do you have an ETA on 2.3.7.7 or 2.3.7.9? Has any thought been given to adopting more rapid/targeted releases (p...
I'm seeing similar things, but the errors just come back. It's as if the check fails and then recovers. Health check is clean but I've opened a TAC case just in case. I'm regretting upgrading to 2.3.6.7, and I keep seeing that there is a 2.3.6.9 refe...
