Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,I am trying to install Hyper Flex with 3 nodes and use the nested v Center setup. Initially I used v3.0.1e then I was about to connect to Hyper Flex connect for v Centersetup but it prompt me an error that no cluster was created, so I redo again f...
Hi Everyone, A brief description of my problem is that I setup a simple ExpreswayC and ExpresswayE with CUCM+CUC+IMP and wanted to make MRA working. Jabber for windows register fine from inside, but when I login from outside and doing MRA, I do not s...
I have this setup where our local telco provider connects to us via SIP trunk. Now I am wondering if it is possible to get the calls logs of CDR in this SIP Trunk? Because whenever I go to CDR, only the H.323 ip address is the available option. Best ...
How do I check the mailbox size per user? And can it be adjusted? Also how do I check the total size of MailBox that all user use?This is for BE6000 with 160gb of storage
I notice that QoS can't be applied at subinterface level but there are two ways to do it in a frame-relay environment which I mention at the subject of this discussion.Now my question is, does this do gives the same result?
I find it kind of weird as well, although I have not experience viewing CDR when SIP is the protocol since all of my gateway are either h323 or mgcp. So what do you think I am missing?
yup, I configured calling party transformation pattern, apply that to Phone device. This works fine if the call is from pstn-to-phone but if the call is from pstn-cuc-phone, it displays the full e.164 (with +) and it does not seem to invoke the calli...
anybody got a solution for this? I'm experiencing the same problem, PSTN numbers calling CUCM phones directlt gets localized, but when PSTN numbers reach CUC then CUC transfer to CUCM phones, localization is not happening. CUCM phones display the ful...
But in some other country (like mine) when using your mobile number and you call to a local number using MGCP in fxo, the caller is already being charge even though the callee is not yet answering the call. I guess cisco doesn't care if thats the cas...
Thats what I thought, everything is almost perfect with MGCP until cisco can find a solution to this automatic answer in fxo port, but until then h323 is a must
