Network Access Control

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), Cisco Access Manager (CAM), Zero Trust Workplace
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
This community is for technical, feature, configuration and deployment questions.
For production deployment issues, please contact the TAC! We will not comment or assist with your TAC case in these forums.
Please see How to Ask the Community for Help for other troubleshooting best practices.

Labels

Forum Posts

If I wich to remain on a UNIX platform and not move to the Windows platform, What are my short term and long term options?

lat5 by Community Member
  • 1247 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

We have VMS 2.2 with CSA 4.0 agents. We also have an ACS3.1 on the network. We want to implement the following functionality: If lets say a certain user does not have all antivirus or OS updates installed, then ACS and CSA should not allow the user t...

pambosch by Level 3
  • 1823 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

I need to set up access on VPN/Security Management Solution with Taccas+. After I install this component of CW2000 i syncronyze him (and register application) with tacacs(vpn/SecurityManagementSolution/Administration/Configuration/AAA-Server-syncrony...

CSCO10456946 by Community Member
  • 1430 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Can the PIX firewall be used to tunnel IP traffic like a router?I am interested in a standard PIX firewall configuration capable of native GRE tunneling encapsulation without encrypting the payload.If so, what is the expected performance; that is how...

donasmith by Visitor
  • 1155 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi,Microsoft 802.1x supplicants do not send a EAPOL logoff because Microsoft does not trust logoff packets. These packets can not be authenticated and can be easily spoofed. Microsoft states that a 802.1x authenticator should not respond to EAPOL log...

vanbon by Community Member
  • 2021 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi. I'm using an IAS Server. There I've defined two policies: One to authorizate a users with Shell:Priv-lvl=7 and other with Shell:Priv-lvl=15. I have this configuration at the router: aaa new-modelaaa authentication login CONTROL group radius local...

AP270778 by Community Member
  • 1127 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes