Switching

Discuss Catalyst brand switches with peers and experts.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

Labels

Forum Posts

Hello, Cisco Community!I’m really happy to share that I’ll be hosting the Cisco Community Lab Series, a brand-new hands-on learning journey designed to help you build practical networking skills step by step.Every Thursday at 8 PM EST, I’ll post a ne...

I got a LES circuit b/t side A and side B. side A is a trunk port connected to carrier. B is CPE of cisco 2611. all ports are Ethernet with defalt MTU size 1500.From A ping B, ping test is fine with whatever MTU size, but there is packet loss when do...

kevin.shi by Level 1
  • 927 Views
  • 5 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

I was hoping to be able to connect the Etherswitch to another switch via the gig port. But if I try to turn it into a switchport and/or a trunk port I am told this is not possible. I don't see anything in the doc http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/...

mmedwid by Level 3
  • 2555 Views
  • 5 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

HiI'm using Cisco Cache Engine 500 and I have some annoying problem. Surfing on the Internet is horrible, website either not loading at all or loading after hundreds of refreshes. Sometimes, when I have two tabs opened in my browser, first with for e...

gornikfan by Level 1
  • 971 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hello All,We have Catalyst 6500 SUP-720-3B( Dual SUP ) IOS ver :12.2(33)SXH2a .Normally working in L2 mode after reboot the Switch comes up in L3 mode. No ip routing resolves this problem till the next reboot. (The configuration has been saved in Sta...

y-asulin by Level 1
  • 937 Views
  • 6 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi, We have IP phones connected to the 3750 switches and here is the configuration of one of the port fa2/0/27 interface FastEthernet2/0/27 switchport access vlan 217 switchport mode access switchport voice vlan 192 speed 100 duplex full srr-queue ba...

pokwan by Level 1
  • 3360 Views
  • 17 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi.One of our sites currently runs on a 6509 conhtaining a supervisor WS-X6K-SUP1A-2GE with PFC and MSFC2. I have learned that CEF requires supervisor 2 at least. On the switch CEF is enabled and populated. How is this possible? Is MLS using the CEF ...

Hi,I am facing problem with my cisco 1841 router and it is not giving me console accese. Please find router logs as below -Readonly ROMMON initializedprogram load complete, entry point: 0x8000f000, size: 0xcb80program load complete, entry point: 0x80...

gagarwal4 by Level 1
  • 1573 Views
  • 5 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

I am extending an existing network to another space and want to use a Cisco 3560-8PC switch, this will give me plenty of future expansion. However, I will need PoE and I would like for the switch to be layer 2 capable, but I cannot find anything in ...

kirbyw001 by Level 1
  • 1256 Views
  • 7 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Resolved! good career advice

Hi every body!I was debating whether to post these questions on this forum or not. I checked to see if there is an proper forum on net pro but found none. So i take my chances to may offend someone , for that i apologise in advance.Now I am looking ...

sarahr202 by Level 5
  • 580 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

I would like to set the COS of 4 to a video server that we have attached to a 6513 module WS-X6748-GE-TX.I have done this before on a 3750 by using the following commandsmls qos cos 4mls qos cos overrideHowever the 'override' option is not available ...

Hi every body! i was reading about the history behind T1 line. I am reading the book" Network warrior" by o'reilly press.This is what my book says" In the 1950s, the only method for connecting phone lines was with a pair of copper wires. For each pho...

sarahr202 by Level 5
  • 952 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hello,i have a C7600 with SUP720/PFC3BXL running 122-33 SRB2 (advanced enterpr.). It is necessary to configure NAT between 2 interfaces belonging to the same VRF. It works fine for TCP traffic but not for UDP traffic. There is a CAVEAT for UDP traff...

f-cagica by Level 1
  • 464 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Does anyone know if enabling flow control would impact network performance during production? I need to configure it on our SAN and it is almost impossible to take it down for maintenance due to the amount of servers running through our 3750 stack.