Switching

Discuss Catalyst brand switches with peers and experts.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

Labels

Forum Posts

Dear Friends,Just a few basic questions on dual-active setup in VSS:We have a scenario on 2 VSS chassis each of them having 1 6708 and 1 VS-720 supervisor. There are no 1G ports except the one on the supervisor.We are using 2 VSL links - one on 6708 ...

Please see the attached for diagram. My issue is that when we perform an IPerf test between two servers, somehow the traffic traverses via the firewall LAN interface ( I see the traffic on the firewall LAN interface spiking during the test) Why isn...

greycrx87 by Level 1
  • 1066 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

I Have 5 building with 3 IDF in each building, the client access range from 100 port to 200 ports 2950 or 2960 with 1 gig uplinks to 3560-g's. my core is two 6500sup720-3b. the bulk of my users are in 3 of the build with about 200 is my largest stack...

Hi All,Abit of a open question really but am really afer abit of advise,Currently we have a flat network 172.16.x.x 255.255.0.0 without any VLAN's, we are now looking to introduce VLAN's into the network using a /24 mask 172.16.10.x 255.255.255.x etc...

TimLaffan by Level 1
  • 504 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Resolved! Multi-region MSTP

I am confused about single vs mult-region MST.  I know that in single region, the IST root is elected by the lowest bridge priority.  But in multi-region, there is also an additional root bridge election (regional root) with lowest cost path to the C...

droeun141 by Level 1
  • 2391 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi all,Im looking at performing a type of crude load balancing from a single Cisco PIX.  I have a scenario whereby I have two ADSL routers directly connected to two seperate external interfaces on the Cisco PIX.  I am aware that the device does not s...

We are using the C2960-LANBASEK9-M image on 2960 switch.   As I understand, this is just a layer 2 switch and therefore should not block traffic by default for example udp broadcast and unicast traffic.  Am I right in thinking this.  Also can somethi...

salrashid by Level 1
  • 14432 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hello,I have two switches(6509 and 2950) in my network which have same vtp domain name. They are not directly connected via a trunk and so they did not exchange VTP updates all this time. However I need to change the vtp domain on 6509, so that I can...

We have 2 x 2960s series 10G and 1 x 2960s POE+ series 10G in a stack connected with two 10G connections to two core switches and I’ve come in this morning to find that i can’t ping the stack at all. So i tried to console into the stack and still no ...

sslackjcb by Level 1
  • 1338 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi Team, We are using MPLS VPN connectivity for inter branch communication. We have chosen Hub & spoke connectivity from MPLS service provider due to cost constrains. Now few of our branches need to communicate each other via HUB router. BGP is the r...

jojiv by Level 1
  • 390 Views
  • 0 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hello,Just a quick question as i did not find any document related to this function on fwsm, is wccp supported on the fwsm and if yes since which version ?My versionFWSM: 4.1(3)ASDM: 6.2(2)FThanks in advance.Regards,

Malette40 by Level 1
  • 1458 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Above config is fine using PVST/RPVST STP.For MST, if I put all VLAN2, 3 and 10 to instance 0 only, MST-STP merge to one such that the Layer 3 design does not work.  Any method to make MST work in layer 3 design using instance 0 only?

ctychan by Level 1
  • 2133 Views
  • 8 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes