MPLS

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

Forum Posts

I'd like to incorporate the Customer Edge switching and the Provider edge routing into one unit. Is it possible to use a C4507R for this purpose ?If the C4500 won't work will a C6500. Or do I need to incorporate the C7200 routers?

bsmueller by Level 1
  • 855 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hello all,Is there someone that can answer me if the following is possible :I´m rebuilding our network (metro ethernet) using 3 6500 (sup3 pfc3bxl) and 3750ME for redundancy.I will do an L3 ring for the 6500:s and connect the ME:s to the neighboring...

lin01jon by Level 1
  • 1693 Views
  • 7 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

class-map Xmatch ip dscp af41!policy whatever class-map Xpolice 312000 24000 48000 conform-action set-mpls-exp-transmit 6 exceed-action set-mpls-exp-transmit 2!Question:does the "set-mpls-exp-transmit" remark or encapsulate this AF41 to MPLS-EXP 6? M...

ebranbilo by Level 1
  • 1231 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi folks:Recently I encountered a LFIB problem in a MPLS VPN interAS setup. The setup of the environment is like this:1. R1-----R2-----R3, R1 in AS1, R2 in AS2 and R3 in AS3.2. R1 is the ASBR for AS1, R2 is the lone MPLS enabled router in AS2, and R...

yenlinsu by Level 1
  • 535 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi all,Does anybody know how to get the value of the attribute_flags of a physical interface over which a MPLS Tunnel could traverse if the affinity bits are conformed?I mean, when we configure with the next CLI commandRouter(config-if)#mpls traffic-...

jdavid_t by Level 1
  • 323 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi,Are DS-TE LSPs allowed to use more bandwidth than allowed by sub-pool or are they limited similarly to the way LLQ max size is limited by a figure specified in "priority" command?I presume that LSP setup will fail in this case, right?Thanks,David

dknov by Level 3
  • 924 Views
  • 9 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi all, I have an IPSec to MPLS solution running on our PE router. Currently IPSec is (Cisco VPN client over the internet) connected with a given VRF based on the group name used. This works, but isn't really ideal for me, it would be much more elega...

j.dolphin by Level 1
  • 500 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

I´m trying to stablish a L3 VPN like you will see in the scenario attached.PEs an P are running OSPF like IGP. The routing protocol running between PEs and CEs is RIP.Although CE1 and CE2 knows the remote networks I can´t ping the remote side(like yo...

msamper by Level 1
  • 666 Views
  • 6 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

If I do (IGP) route aggregation inside a MPLS domain it would break LSPs created between end-points, I mean ingress-egress points (PEs), that have the node deploying route aggregation is its path.Also, LSP creation is topology driven, not traffic dri...

mpugliese by Level 1
  • 1198 Views
  • 6 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hello everybody,I would like to get some advise in a tag-switching config in order to perform a testing: I have a Cisco 12012 and a Cisco 7507 each with a GigE interface. I would like to establish several tdp sessions using this single interface. I w...

natamen by Level 1
  • 673 Views
  • 7 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi,Can anyone shed some light on the issue of EXP field propagation as labels are removed or added?Specifically....1. I understand that at ingress of MPLS cloud you would use class-based policy to apply the initial EXP value based on some class-map m...

dknov by Level 3
  • 486 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hello,I have read that with EoMPLS, the 4 byte control word is optional, but by default the PE router includes it during the LDP negotiation.Does anyone know whether it is possible to explicitly disable the use of the control word in the Cisco IOS. ...

Top Solution Authors