Routing

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Labels

Forum Posts

Hi,I'm having cisco1921/k9 router. I have applied for the upgradation of lease line from 1Mbps to 2Mbps. Today i informed by service provider that your link is upgraded now. Interface Gig0/0 is conencted with SP.Can anybody tell me how i can get to k...

Dear all     There is a new cisco3925 router and with IOS version is :"System image file is "flash0:c3900-universalk9-mz.SPA.152-4.M4.bin"  , I want to use the " IP sla + track " feature  , it can't support in the version ,  which version of the c390...

Hi,This is my config**** Interface config ****interface GigabitEthernet0/0description ISP Linkdampeningmtu 1540no ip addressno ip redirectsno ip unreachablesno ip proxy-arpno ip mroute-cachecarrier-delay msec 0duplex fullspeed 1000media-type rj45serv...

Hi.I am currently studying multi area OSPF neighbor relationship topics.Question is, why are some networks designed to have routers on a shared ethernet segment?I am only familiar with routers representing branch offices connected to the HQ site. So ...

I'm considering adding a second 3945 (internet connectivity) router and would like to implement router redundancy. WHat is the best method for an active/active configuration? I would also add a second ISP link to the other router with BGP.thoughts?

Hi,Looking at using the ME3600 to terminate VRF's (with Advanced Metro IP Access) and am trying to confirm what L3 performance they have? (Looked at the router and switch performance pdf's but no info on the me3600/3800's?)Cheers.

Hello all!I've just recently upgraded a Cisco 877 to 887W router.I basically copied most of the config across to the router with no problem. ppp chap hostname and password all ok. ATM and Dialer1 interface comes up.The problem I'm having is when I op...

JDMJeffy84 by Level 1
  • 13257 Views
  • 19 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

I am restricting throughput speeds on a connection using policy-maps on a subnet with police rules. While this works to restrict download speeds to the desired amount, it does nothing to restrict upload speeds. I had thought the service-policy output...