Switching

Discuss Catalyst brand switches with peers and experts.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

Labels

Forum Posts

Welcome to the Cisco Community Ask Me Anything conversation. Submit your questions from Monday, February 2, 2026, through Friday, February 20, 2026. Our colleagues Amruta Navadagi, Anaya Kalawat, and Mohammad Mehtabuddin will be waiting to assist you...

IMG_1447.jpeg IMG_1448.jpeg IMG_1446.jpeg
amnavada by Cisco Employee
  • 1724 Views
  • 29 replies
  • 1 Helpful votes

I have uploaded the EDS file from the switch and added it to my PLC programs IO tree. No matter what choice i select for the connection i get error code 16#0126 Connection Request Error: Invalid configuration size. Has anyone here successfully used a...

ewieters_0-1749818591697.png ewieters_1-1749818786498.png
ewieters by Visitor
  • 1506 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Good evening! I'm hoping someone can help us out with this unstable stack. For 8 months in testing a stack of 7 C9300-24UX units ran with no problems on 17.3.4 Dublin. This morning we moved the WAN, WiFi, IP phones and a Brocade switch stack over to ...

I have 2 C9500-48Y4C switches.Before I deploy them I want to make sure that everything is current and matching.When I do show version on one of them, I get this:Motherboard Assembly Number : 4873Model Revision Number : V02Motherboard Revision Number ...

RVTim14 by Level 2
  • 783 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

PaI am using Packet Tracer to create a Lab. On NY-R1 I am not able to create the port-channel 1.10 sub-interface.  Does Packet Tracer allow me to create ether-channel sub-interface? NY-R1(config)#interface port-channel 1.10 ^ % Invalid input detecte...

SSShine_0-1761831656557.png
SS-Shine by Community Member
  • 1178 Views
  • 10 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Resolved! Extended Vlans

I am attaching here one of my cisco 3550 "sh ver" and "sh vtp status" kindly let me know does this switch support extended vlan (upto 4094) RegardsMahesh

Is it necessary to change the MTU for SVL links in a scenario in which interfaces are configured with MTU larger than default 1500 bytes?Traffic could flow between chassis through SVL links in a Stackwise Virtual cluster. Could not find any reference...

ckuwajima by Level 3
  • 2381 Views
  • 13 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes