Switching

Discuss Catalyst brand switches with peers and experts.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

Labels

Forum Posts

Hello, Cisco Community!I’m really happy to share that I’ll be hosting the Cisco Community Lab Series, a brand-new hands-on learning journey designed to help you build practical networking skills step by step.Every Thursday at 8 PM EST, I’ll post a ne...

Please see the attached for diagram. My issue is that when we perform an IPerf test between two servers, somehow the traffic traverses via the firewall LAN interface ( I see the traffic on the firewall LAN interface spiking during the test) Why isn...

greycrx87 by Level 1
  • 1190 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

I Have 5 building with 3 IDF in each building, the client access range from 100 port to 200 ports 2950 or 2960 with 1 gig uplinks to 3560-g's. my core is two 6500sup720-3b. the bulk of my users are in 3 of the build with about 200 is my largest stack...

Hi All,Abit of a open question really but am really afer abit of advise,Currently we have a flat network 172.16.x.x 255.255.0.0 without any VLAN's, we are now looking to introduce VLAN's into the network using a /24 mask 172.16.10.x 255.255.255.x etc...

TimLaffan by Level 1
  • 550 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Resolved! Multi-region MSTP

I am confused about single vs mult-region MST.  I know that in single region, the IST root is elected by the lowest bridge priority.  But in multi-region, there is also an additional root bridge election (regional root) with lowest cost path to the C...

droeun141 by Level 1
  • 2556 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi all,Im looking at performing a type of crude load balancing from a single Cisco PIX.  I have a scenario whereby I have two ADSL routers directly connected to two seperate external interfaces on the Cisco PIX.  I am aware that the device does not s...

We are using the C2960-LANBASEK9-M image on 2960 switch.   As I understand, this is just a layer 2 switch and therefore should not block traffic by default for example udp broadcast and unicast traffic.  Am I right in thinking this.  Also can somethi...

salrashid by Level 1
  • 14819 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hello,I have two switches(6509 and 2950) in my network which have same vtp domain name. They are not directly connected via a trunk and so they did not exchange VTP updates all this time. However I need to change the vtp domain on 6509, so that I can...

We have 2 x 2960s series 10G and 1 x 2960s POE+ series 10G in a stack connected with two 10G connections to two core switches and I’ve come in this morning to find that i can’t ping the stack at all. So i tried to console into the stack and still no ...

sslackjcb by Level 1
  • 1447 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi Team, We are using MPLS VPN connectivity for inter branch communication. We have chosen Hub & spoke connectivity from MPLS service provider due to cost constrains. Now few of our branches need to communicate each other via HUB router. BGP is the r...

jojiv by Level 1
  • 422 Views
  • 0 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hello,Just a quick question as i did not find any document related to this function on fwsm, is wccp supported on the fwsm and if yes since which version ?My versionFWSM: 4.1(3)ASDM: 6.2(2)FThanks in advance.Regards,

Malette40 by Level 1
  • 1524 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Above config is fine using PVST/RPVST STP.For MST, if I put all VLAN2, 3 and 10 to instance 0 only, MST-STP merge to one such that the Layer 3 design does not work.  Any method to make MST work in layer 3 design using instance 0 only?

ctychan by Level 1
  • 2316 Views
  • 8 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi,Can anybody advise whether it is possible to create a VSS pair using CWDM.The scenario is 2 Data Centres with 2 Dark Fibres between them. Each DC has a 6509 capable of VSS. A CWDM-MUX8A and EWDM-MUX8 for 10GB connectivity would be installed at eac...

iwearing by Level 1
  • 1148 Views
  • 7 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes